Home

June Medical Services v Russo

June Medical Services LLC v

June Medical Services, LLC v

  1. June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee), which the Center argued on March 4, 2020, challenged a Louisiana law (Act 620) that would have prevented doctors from providing abortion services in the state unless they secured admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of where they provide abortion care
  2. 4 JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO Syllabus . eral conclusions in respect to the burden that Act 620 is likely to im-pose upon women's ability to access an abortion in Louisiana. It found that enforcing that requirement would prevent Does 1, 2, and 6 from providing abortions altogether. Doe 3 gave uncontradicted, in-cour
  3. June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee) was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 4, 2020, during the court's October 2019-2020 term. The case came on a writ. A court's written order commanding the recipient to either do or refrain from doing a specified act
  4. Note: On February 6, 2020, June Medical Services v.Gee changed to June Medical Services v.Russo due to a staffing change at the Louisiana Department of Health. All references in this report have.
  5. ority for the third time in the last two weeks
  6. The case, June Medical Services v. Russo, was a challenge to a Louisiana law that required abortion providers have admitting privileges with a nearby hospital -- an agreement between a doctor and.

June Medical Services v. Russo - A Threat to Physicians' Standing to Challenge Abortion Regulations. June Medical Services v. Russo - A Threat to Physicians' Standing to Challenge Abortion Regulations N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 17;383(12):1101-1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025176.. In June Medical Services v. Russo, the court ruled, 5 to 4, that a Louisiana law violated the Constitution when it required doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby. Russo. June Medical Services v. Russo is a US Supreme Court decision that found a medically unnecessary requirement that physicians who provide abortion obtain local admitting privileges at a hospital is unconstitutional. The decision follows after the Court in 2016 struck down a nearly identical law in Whole Woman's Health v June Medical Services v. Russo: A Temporary Victory for Reproductive Rights. Reproductive rights have felt tenuous in the last few years with the election of Donald Trump and his recent appointments of Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. The Supreme Court's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo,1 therefore, was much anticipated The June Medical Services LLC v. Russo case is a challenge to a Louisiana law, the Louisiana Unsafe Abortion Protection Act (Act 620), which requires physicians who perform abortions in the.

The best reading of the Court's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo is that Roberts just gave the constitutional right to an abortion a potentially very brief reprieve The June Medical Services LLC v. Russo case is a challenge to a Louisiana law, Louisiana Unsafe Abortion Protection Act (Act 620), which requires physicians who perform abortions in the. Soon after passage of the Act, June Medical Services LLC, the parent company of Hope and Bossier abortion clinics, sued to block one specific aspect of it from going into effect. This challenge came to Section 1, which amended R.S. 40:1299.35.2 [3] to require any physicians t In June Medical Services v. Russo, the Chief Justice provided the fifth vote for striking down one such stringent regulation—a Louisiana law that required abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges within 30 miles of their clinic. Concurring in the judgment,. 2 Center for American Progress | June Medical Services v. Russo The law at issue in June Medical is Louisiana's Act 620, which requires an abortion pro-vider to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of where any abortion is performed, among other changes.3 Act 620 is an example of a targeted regulation o

June Medical Services v. Russo is a challenge to a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers have admitting privileges with a nearby hospital, an agreement between a doctor and a hospital that. The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in June Medical Services v.Russo (formerly June Medical Services v.Gee) on June 29, 2020-and threw out an unconstitutional Louisiana abortion restriction.Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the opinion in the 5-4 ruling. Read about the Supreme Court's decision in June Medical Services v.Russo here.. Read the Center's analysis of the Court's ruling here In June Medical Services v. Russo, a plurality of the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that would have thwarted abortion access to such a degree that it would have left thousands of Louisiana women with no practical means of obtaining a safe, legal abortion.. The decision is being reported as a victory Russo. The 2019 Supreme Court Term has been full of foreshadowings. These suggested possible outcomes of the Court's decision Monday in June Medical Services. The signs Court watchers were reading included extensive debates in other cases about stare decisis, or adherence to precedent, among members of the Court

June Medical Services LLC v. Gee (En Banc Denial) at 1-2. June Medical then filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, which the United States Supreme Court granted on October 4, 2019. Proceedings & Orders, 18-1323. Analysis . WHETHER JUNE MEDICAL HAS STANDING TO ASSERT THE RIGHTS OF PATIENTS SEEKING ABORTIONS The Supreme Court's recent decision in June Medical Services v.Russo surprised many observers anticipating a decisive step in dismantling Roe v.Wade.The case questioned the constitutionality of a Louisiana law that required abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a hospital within thirty miles of a clinic

Docket for 18-1323 - Supreme Court of the United State

June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo. In June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, the Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana's Act 620, a law which required physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, holding it unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt By Rachel Rebouché. In June Medical Services v.Russo, the Supreme Court held that a Louisiana law requiring that physicians obtain admitting privileges at a nearby hospital was unconstitutional.Had the law taken effect, all but one provider would have lost the ability to deliver abortion care in the state. Despite the result, a number of commentators have expressed concern about the future of. On December 2, 2019, NCLR filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 24 national LGBTQ organizations in the case June Medical Services v. Russo. The case involves a challenge to a law in Louisiana that would force all but one abortion clinic in that state to close, a law [

Standing in June Medical Services v. Russo Explained. By Rebecca Reingold | Leave a Comment Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in June Medical Services v.Russo, a case involving an admitting privileges law passed by the Louisiana legislature that is identical to the Texas admitting privileges law struck down as unconstitutional in Whole Woman's Health v On June 29, 2020, the Supreme Court issued its first major abortion decision on the merits since Justice Anthony Kennedy's retirement. The consolidated cases, June Medical Services v.Russo and Russo v.June Medical Services, involved the constitutionality of Louisiana's law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital, and whether abortion. June Medical Services v. Russo Supreme Court of the United States The Supreme Court has tragically struck down Louisiana's 2014 Unsafe Abortion Protection Act. Women remain in jeopardy at substandard abortion facilities. Oral Arguments: March 4, 2020 Decision: June 29, 2020. LARTL Initial Press Release on Ruling LARTL Follow-Up Press Release on Ruling LARTL Reaction:..

(National Review) In the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling [] in June Medical Services v. Russo, abortion-rights groups are hailing the decision as a victory for women's health care.Anyone familiar with the specifics of the Louisiana law — and not financially invested in propping up our regime of entirely unfettered legal abortion — knows this claim is obviously untrue June Medical Services LLC v. Russo: What You Need to Know Hospital admitting privileges grant a doctor the right to directly admit a patient to a specific hospital and provide care for the patient.

June Medical Services, LLC, v

  1. e whether the abortion clinic that had filed the lawsuit had legal standing to do so
  2. es what it could mean for Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization , an abortion case on the Supreme Court's October, 2021 docket. Jim reviews the concurring opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in June Medical Services , in which he concluded that respect for precedent compelled the same result in June Medical Services.
  3. The law at issue in June Medical Services v. Russo seeks to ensure that women get the competent and quality care that they deserve, Jeanne Mancini, president of the anti-abortion group March for.
  4. June Medical Services v. Russo In June Medical Services v. Russo, the Supreme Court rejected Louisiana's request to revisit long-established precedent and deny the legal entitlement of.

Monday's case, June Medical Services v.Russo, dealt with abortion restrictions that are identical to a Texas law that the Supreme Court struck down in 2016's Whole Woman's Health v. Russo. ACOG Statement on June Medical Services v. Russo. Washington, DC - The following is a statement from Maureen G. Phipps, MD, MPH, FACOG, chief executive officer of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, on today's decision from the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of June Medical Services, LLC, v. Russo But in a counter-petition, Russo v. June Medical Services, the state of Louisiana is questioning the entire basis of the case, specifically the right of abortion providers to file lawsuits that.

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES . V. RUSSO. ORAL ARGUMENTS: MARCH 4, 2020. The Louisiana abortion industry, with their long history of health and safety violations, cannot speak for Louisiana women. They . must be held to the same safety standards as every other outpatient surgical facility. Let's put patients over profits and protect women. MEDIA PACKE The case, June Medical Services v Russo, was a pivotal test of how the court's new conservative majority would rule on efforts to restrict women's right to abortion, after Donald Trump. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday for June Medical Services v. Russo, a case that challenges a 2014 Louisiana law. The result could impact abortion access across the country. The ruling in June Medical Services v. Russo also comes just months ahead of a heated presidential election in which anti-abortion and abortion rights groups are spending tens of millions of.

Editor's Note: This entry addresses the consolidated cases June Medical Services LLC v. Russo (18-1323) and Russo v. June Medical Services LLC (18-1460). Jareb Gleckel: In June Medical Services, physicians challenge a statute that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals within thirty miles of their respective. But June Medical Services v. Russo raises two more issues that are almost as foundational as that one: whether, in the words of the main Center for Reproductive Rights brief to the Court, legal holdings of higher courts are binding on lower courts, and whether courts that hear appeals will accept the factual record that trial courts pass. On March 4, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in June Medical Services, LLC v.Russo, one of the most contentious cases on its current docket.June Medical is an appeal from a Fifth Circuit decision upholding a Louisiana law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. The Fifth Circuit's decision appears to directly conflict with the. June Medical Services v. Russo . On Wednesday, the justices will hear oral argument in a case involving Louisiana's law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a.

In June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, the Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana's Act 620, a law which required physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, holding it unconstitutional under the Supreme Court's 2016 decision in Whole Woman's Health v.Hellerstedt On March 4th, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee), a challenge to a Louisiana law requiring that abortion providers have admitting privileges at a local hospital in order to practice. If the law goes into effect, two of the state's three remaining abortion clinics could be shut down In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of abortion providers in June Medical Services v.Russo, striking down a Louisiana law that required abortionists to maintain admitting. June Medical Services v. Russo (2020) On 29 th June, 2020, the United States Supreme Court delivered a fractured ruling, in a vote which can only be described as 4-1-4, invalidating a Louisiana Law which had placed various restrictions on abortion providers, such as requiring them to have active admitting privileges in hospitals in a 30-mile. On March 4, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in June Medical Services v. Russo, in which Hope is a plaintiff. It's the first major abortion case before the nation's highest court since.

For full coverage of June Medical Services v. Russo, check out our Special Report. For the last several months, abortion rights enthusiasts have eyed Chief Justice Roberts nervously, waiting to see if he would blow up the U.S. Supreme Court's abortion rights jurisprudence in June Medical Services v.Russo, a case about whether a hospital admitting privileges law that the Court already said. Podcast. Boom! Lawyered: Rapid Reaction — A Great Decision (Plus a Roberts Time Bomb) on Abortion Access. Jun 29, 1:30pm. The June Medical Services v. Russo decision is in! Jessica Mason Pieklo and Imani Gandy explain the ins and outs in the latest episode of Boom! Lawyered. Commentary Law and Policy June Medical Services v. Russo, a case that the Supreme Court will hear next Wednesday, could easily be the case that drains this right of its remaining force. The right to an abortion's fate. Read the full article. On June 29, 2020, the US Supreme Court handed down its decision on June Medical Services v Russo, its first abortion case since President Donald Trump appointed 2 new conservative justices—leading many to predict the end of Roe v Wade.1 However, Chief Justice John Roberts joined his 4 more liberal colleagues to strike. June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly Gee) is the first major abortion case before the Supreme Court since Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were appointed to the bench.Before this month ends, a.

In a decision released Monday, the high court ruled in the case of June Medical Services v. Russo that abortion providers do not need to be held to stricter standards. Justice Stephen Breyer announced the judgment of the court and was joined in his opinion by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan DENVER, CO - Today, the United States Supreme Court handed abortion advocates a victory in its decision on June Medical Services v.Russo.With this decision, the Supreme Court upheld precedent set in the 2016 Whole Woman's Health v.Hellerstedt decision.The following statement is attributed to Vicki Cowart, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains (PPRM) The court took up June Medical Services v. Russo in March, a case in which an abortion provider challenged a 2014 Louisiana state law introduced by Jackson. The Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, or Act 620 , requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges in a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion facility

Video: June Medical Services v

The chief justice joined with SCOTUS's leftists in June Medical Services v. Russo, authoring his own opinion that betrays the Constitution, life, and women June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo has already begun gaining currency as a Trojan Horse: in form, a case that strikes down a Louisiana anti-abortion measure, but in substance, an anti-choice, pro-life ruling that effectively tees up fu-ture reversals of the Supreme Court's reproductive rights jurisprudence

June Medical Services v. Russo is the U.S.Supreme Court's first abortion case since President Donald Trump appointed two new conservative justices—leading many to predict the end of Roe v. Wade. Yet Chief Justice John Roberts joined his four more liberal colleagues to strike down the restriction by a 5-4 majority June Medical Services v. Russo is strikingly similar to a Texas law the Court struck down four years ago. Both are considered to be the targeted regulation of abortion providers. But now, there are more conservative Justices on the bench June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, 140 S. Ct. 2103 Opinion handed down June 29, 2020. By Lucy Downing. I. Introduction In a five-four decision, the United States Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law requiring physicians who provide abortions to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital Abstract. June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo has already begun gaining a certain reputation as a Trojan Horse: in form, a pro-choice ruling that overturns a Louisiana anti-abortion measure, but in substance, an anti-choice, pro-life decision that sets the stage for future reversals of the Supreme Court's reproductive rights jurisprudence. Without denying that prospect, this work. On March 4, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will hear opening arguments for June Medical Services v. Russo. (Please note that this case was originally referred to as June Medical Services v. Gee. However, Secretary Rebekah Gee resigned from her position on January 31, 2020, and was replaced by Interim Secretary Stephen Russo.

The recent June Medical Services vs. Russo decision safeguarded the right to abortion access for vulnerable communities in Louisiana—but it was a small victory in the larger battle for abortion rights and access. Ms. talked to Pearl Ricks, Executive Director of the Reproductive Justice Action Collective, about the June Medical decision and. As the U.S. Supreme Court heard the oral arguments in the Louisiana abortion case June Medical Services LLC v.Russo Wednesday, advocates and opponents gathered outside in opposing rallies. With. 2020 has been a notable year for reproductive rights. On one hand, the Supreme Court has decided June Medical Services v. Russo, its first abortion-related case following the changeover from Justices Scalia and Kennedy to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. On the other hand, the COVID-19 pandemic has also impacted access to abortion, sexual health, and.

Victoria Pickering

Supreme Court hands down major decision reaffirming

On Wednesday, March 5, the Supreme Court heard the oral arguments for June Medical Services v.Russo.. This pivotal, but not unfamiliar, case deals with a Louisiana law that would require abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges to a hospital within a 30 mile radius Defying expectations, the Supreme Court narrowly struck down a hyper-restrictive Louisiana abortion law on Monday. The court ruled 5 to 4 in June Medical Services v.Russo that Louisiana can't require abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, cutting off one avenue anti-abortion lawmakers had hoped to use to trample abortion access, while signaling it would view other.

Louisiana Abortion Law Struck Down by Supreme Court - The

By Kelley Huber, JHBL Chief Symposium Editor Abortion advocates and opponents are waiting fervently for the Supreme Court's decision in June Medical Services v.Russo, an appeal from the 5 th Circuit. In this case, the state of Louisiana is attempting to implement hospital admitting privileges as a requirement for abortion clinics to remain open under current state health protocols Under this. A new study shared exclusively with CBS News shows abortion access could be heavily restricted in more than a dozen states depending on the Supreme Court's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo Fortunately, on June 29, 2020 — in June Medical Services v. Russo — the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's medically unnecessary law that would have made abortion virtually inaccessible in the state. It was another win for abortion access, but the fight isn't over

Abortion is Back at the Supreme Court: New Analysis of

Bristol Regional Women's Center v. Slatery. The Bristol Regional Women's Center is challenging a 2015 Tennessee law protecting women and requiring a waiting period before abortions can be procured. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a similar waiting period in Planned Parenthood v. Casey July 1, 2020. The following is Bioethics Defense Fund's initial review of the U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 29, 2020 in June Medical Services v.Russo, striking down Louisiana's requirement that physicians have hospital privileges to admit and treat the women they injure in the course of an elective abortion. Bioethics Defense Fund attorneys Nikolas T. Nikas and Dorinda C.

Possible Responses to the Major Abortion Case Before theSupreme Court Hears Case Threatening to Decimate Abortion

Supreme Court: Why Chief Justice Roberts struck an anti

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree (D-Maine) today released the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that June Medical Services v. Russo, Louisiana's abortion admitting privileges law, is unconstitutional: Today the Supreme Court once again affirmed that abortion access is a constitutional right FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 29, 2020. CONTACT: Amy O'Donnell, Director of Communications 512.477.1244 (o) amy@texasallianceforlife.org. AUSTIN, TX — Today the United States Supreme Court, on a narrow 5-4 vote, issued June Medical Services v.Russo to prevent enforcement of Louisiana's law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have privileges to practice medicine at a nearby hospital June Medical Services v. Russo not only threatens access to care, it also brings up the issue of third-party standing and whether it is applicable in abortion cases. If the Court rules that physicians and health centers no longer have third-party standing, it will make it much more difficult for unnecessary abortion restrictions to be challenged in the courts June Medical Services v. Russo is the first abortion lawsuit to be heard by this new court transformed by President Donald Trump, and its outcome could carry serious implications for the future of.

Abortion Back at the Supreme Court: June Medical Services

But abortion activists filed a lawsuit in June Medical Services v. Russo (previously v. Gee) claim the law is an undue burden on access to abortion. The abortion facility Hope Medical Group for Women and the pro-abortion Center for Reproductive Rights law firm are sued to overturn it. There were two major points at issue The cases are June Medical Services v. Russo, 18-1323, and Russo v. June Medical Services, 18-1460. To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joe Sobczyk at jsobczyk@bloomberg.net. Laurie Assé At issue in June Medical Services LLC v. Russo (No. 18-1323) was the constitutionality of a Louisiana law regulating abortion providers that was nearly word-for-word identical to a Texas law the Court struck down four years ago in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt June Medical v. Russo could decide the fate of abortion access in America: in one month, the Supreme Court will also hear arguments on case about access to birth control WASHINGTON, DC — Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in June Medical Services v Dear Friends and Allies, In the coming days, the U.S. Supreme Court will announce its decision in June Medical Services v. Russo, the first abortion case since Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh became members of the Court. The Court will be ruling on the constitutionality of a Louisiana law that is identical to a Texas law [

Twilight Patriot: John Roberts And The Men Who Made HimSchumer warns Gorsuch and Kavanaugh ‘You have released the

The History of June Medical Services v

Many pro-lifers rightly condemned the Supreme Court's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo, because it struck down Louisiana's common-sense requirement of hospital admitting privileges. The legislation at issue in June Medical Services v. Russo was designed to safeguard women's health and safety, which the abortion business in Louisiana egregiously sidelined for the sake of profit On June 29, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided June Medical Services L.L.C. et al. v. Russo, Interim Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, holding that abortion providers had standing to assert the constitutional rights of patients in challenging a Louisiana law requiring the providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, and the law was unconstitutional. The cases are June Medical Services v. Russo, 18-1323, and Russo v. June Medical Services, 18-1460. To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net. To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joe Sobczyk at jsobczyk@bloomberg.net June Medical Services v. Russo (U.S. Supreme Court, June 29, 2020): In a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court held that a Louisiana law requiring abortion providers to obtain hospital admitting privileges is unconstitutional under the Court's precedent in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016). Louisiana Act 602 requires a provider to have.

Supreme Court Strikes Down ‘Unconstitutional’ Louisiana

What Chief Justice Roberts's June Medical Concurrence

Please join us to learn more about the upcoming supreme court case June Medical Services LLC v Russo. On March 4, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in June Medical Services v. Russo, a case brought that challenges a Louisiana law designed to close clinics and undermine access to abortion Dov Fox, I. Glenn Cohen (Faculty Director), Eli Y. Adashi JAMA September 14, 2020. Read the full article. On June 29, 2020, the US Supreme Court handed down its decision on June Medical Services v Russo, its first abortion case since President Donald Trump appointed 2 new conservative justices—leading many to predict the end of Roe v Wade.1 However, Chief Justice John Roberts joined his 4. Groups, Medical Groups on June Medical — July 2, 2020 — The medical community celebrates the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of June Medical Services v. Russo. This decision confirms once again that our justice system will not tolerate restrictions on our patients

Abstract. June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo has already begun gaining a certain reputation as a Trojan Horse: in form, a pro-choice ruling that overturns a Louisiana anti-abortion measure, but in substance, an anti-choice, pro-life decision that sets the stage for future reversals of the Supreme Court's reproductive rights jurisprudence On June 29, 2020, the Court in a 5-4 decision struck down the Louisiana law. The Supreme Court heard the consolidated oral arguments in June Medical Services v. Russo and Russo v.June Medical. The Louisiana law behind the case of June Medical Services v.Russo is similar to a law in Texas that was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 2016 -- indeed, in 2017, a federal judge struck it down on the basis on the 2016 Supreme Court decision.. In that 5-3 decision, the Supreme Court majority said the law, which required doctors to have admitting privileges at local hospitals and. JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC d/b/a HOPE MEDICAL GROUP FOR WOMEN, on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff; BOSSIER CITY MEDICAL SUITE, on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff; CHOICE, INC., OF TEXAS, d/b/a CAUSEWAY MEDICAL CLINIC, on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff, JOHN DOE 1, M.D., AND JOHN DOE 2, M.D On Wednesday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in June Medical Services v.Russo, a case that is built on lies about Louisiana's reasons for trying to regulate abortion providers.